Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The progress in markerless technologies is providing clinicians with tools to shorten the time of assessment rapidly, but raises questions about the potential trade-off in accuracy compared to traditional marker-based systems. This study evaluated the OpenCap system against a traditional marker-based system-Vicon. Our focus was on its performance in capturing walking both toward and away from two iPhone cameras in the same setting, which allowed capturing the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test. The performance of the OpenCap system was compared to that of a standard marker-based system by comparing spatial-temporal and kinematic parameters in 10 participants. The study focused on identifying potential discrepancies in accuracy and comparing results using correlation analysis. Case examples further explored our results. The OpenCap system demonstrated good accuracy in spatial-temporal parameters but faced challenges in accurately capturing kinematic parameters, especially in the walking direction facing away from the cameras. Notably, the two walking directions observed significant differences in pelvic obliquity, hip abduction, and ankle flexion. Our findings suggest areas for improvement in markerless technologies, highlighting their potential in clinical settings.
Martiš et al. (Mon,) studied this question.