Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Abstract Purpose To explore the clinical efficacy of total hip arthroplasty (THA) assisted by full-process robotics in patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). Methods Sixty-four patients were divided into two groups: the robotic-assisted group (n = 32) and the conventional group (n = 32). A retrospective study was conducted to compare the therapeutic differences between the two groups. Results All 64 patients underwent THA successfully, with an average follow-up time of (12.27 ± 0.17) months, and no relevant complications occurred. In the robotic-assisted group, the anteversion angle and abduction angle of the acetabular cup placement were within the safe zone, while in the conventional group, there were 4 cases outside the safe zone. The postoperative Harris score and FJS score were higher, and the VAS score was lower in the robotic-assisted group compared to the conventional group. Conclusion Robotic-assisted THA demonstrates advantages in intraoperative precision and postoperative efficacy in treating patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip compared to the conventional manual approach.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hong-xin et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: