Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background Understanding of the ratio of photosynthetic photon flux density ( Q p ) to global solar radiation ( R s ) ( Q p / R s ) is crucial for applying R s to ecology-related studies. Previous studies reported Q p / R s and its variations based on measurements from a single observatory tower, instead of multi-site-based measurements over complex terrains. This may neglect spatial heterogeneity in the terrain, creating a gap in an understanding of how terrain affects Q p / R s and how this effect interacts with meteorological factors. Methods Here the Qingyuan Ker Towers (three towers in a valley with different terrains: T1, T2, and T3) were utilized to measure Q p and R s over mountainous forests of Northeast China. An airborne LiDAR system was used to generate a digital elevation model, and sky view factor of sectors (SVF s ) divided from the field of view of tower’s pyranometer was calculated as a topographic factor to explain the variations of Q p / R s . Results The results identified significant differences in Q p / R s of the three towers at both daily and half-hour scales, with larger differences on clear days than on overcast days. Q p / R s was positively correlated with SVF s of T1 and T3, while this correlation was negative with that of T2. The effect of SVF s on Q p / R s interacted with clearness index, water vapor pressure and solar zenith angle. Random forest-based importance assessment demonstrated that explanation ( R 2 ) on Q p / R s was improved when SVF s was included in the predictor variable set, indicating that incorporating terrain effects enhances the prediction accuracy of Q p / R s . The improvement in the R 2 values was more pronounced on clear days than on overcast days, suggesting that the effect of terrain on Q p / R s depended on sky conditions. Conclusions All findings suggested that Q p / R s is affected by terrain, and integrating terrain information into existing Q p / R s models is a feasible solution to improve Q p / R s estimates in mountainous areas.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: