This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
In this article, I explore several prominent arguments forwarded by advocates of the antinatalist philosophy. Mainly, I assess the asymmetry argument, the argument concerning the lack of consent by future individuals, the arguments about the quality and meaning of life, and the imposition argument. After identifying some issues with the asymmetry argument and underscoring the strengths of the other arguments, I propose a form of antinatalism that accepts procreation under narrowly defined circumstances to avert species extinction and its potentially catastrophic consequences from a cosmic perspective.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Luca Lo Sapio (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: