Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Experimental evaluation demonstrates enhanced catalytic activity and sulfur resistance in facet-engineered iron oxide nanorods, highlighting crystal facet control for emission reduction.
The development of Fe-based catalysts for the selective catalytic reduction of NOx by NH3 (NH3–SCR of NOx) has garnered significant attention due to their exceptional SO2 resistance. However, the influence of different sulfur-containing species (e.g., ferric sulfates and ammonium sulfates) on the NH3–SCR activity of Fe-based catalysts as well as its dependence on exposed crystal facets of Fe2O3 has not been revealed. This work disclosed that nanorod-like α-Fe2O3 (Fe2O3–NR) predominantly exposing (110) facet performed better than nanosheet-like α-Fe2O3 (Fe2O3–NS) predominantly exposing (001) facet in NH3–SCR reaction, due to the advantages of Fe2O3–NR in redox properties and surface acidity. Furthermore, the results of the SO2/H2O resistance test at a critical temperature of 250 °C, catalytic performance evaluations on Fe2O3–NR and Fe2O3–NS sulfated by SO2 + O2 or deposited with NH4HSO4 (ABS), and systematic characterization revealed that the reactivity of ammonium sulfates on Fe2O3 catalysts to NO(+O2) contributed to their improved catalytic performance, while ferric sulfates showed enhancing and inhibiting effects on NH3–SCR activity on Fe2O3–NR and Fe2O3–NS, respectively; despite this, Fe2O3–NR showed higher affinity for SO2 + O2. This work set a milestone in understanding the NH3–SCR reaction on Fe2O3 catalysts in the presence of SO2 from the aspect of crystal facet engineering.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
He et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: