When, in 2011, concerns grew over the state of science, a community of individuals quickly organized with the goal of reforming science through improving its practices and its culture. While the reform community is often referred to as a single community in literature and informal discourse, previous qualitative research gives rise to the question of whether we should consider that the reform community is, in fact, a collection of communities who each approach the goal of improving science in their own overlapping, yet distinct ways – with their own methods, philosophies, and priorities. This study takes a social network analysis approach to this question, using a partitioning algorithm to explore the sub-community structure of a larger, single network. I find evidence of a possible sub-community structure in the reform community and conclude with implications of this finding for the future progress of the science reform movement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Field et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: