Analysis reveals key actors in replication initiatives, indicating a shift towards cross-disciplinary engagement in open science.
The replicability as well as the reproducibility of research findings has been a central concern for methodological standards in many research fields for several decades. However, the most recent wave – as represented by the Open Science movement – and their efforts to improve and increase replicability and reproducibility in science have since grown to a level that surpasses earlier debates: Concerns are no longer confined to specific fields, but have become cross- and trans-disciplinary, even involving actors from outside the strictly academic sphere, such as commercial academic publishers, business entrepreneurs, private funders, and political stakeholders. In this paper we take a closer look at one of the movement’s core communities, the community forming around replications. By sharing our observations of ‘replication initiatives’ (RIs), and their infrastructures we derive a typology of its most visibly engaged actors, hoping to provide those interested in science reform with a systematic perspective on how to assess the ongoing reform proposals and activities within the Open Science space.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bartscherer et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: