PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 7, 2024International Journal of Robotics and Control Systems5 citations

A Novel Sea Horse Optimizer Based Load Frequency Controller for Two-Area Power System with PV and Thermal Units

View Full Paper
CACenk AndiçSOSercan OzumcanMVMetin Varan

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

This study introduces the Sea Horse Optimizer (SHO), a novel optimization algorithm designed for Load Frequency Control (LFC) in two-area power systems including photovoltaic and thermal units. Inspired by the interactive behaviors of seahorses, this population-based metaheuristic algorithm leverages strategies like Brownian motion and Levy flights to efficiently search for optimal solutions, demonstrating quicker and more stable identification of global and local optima than traditional algorithms. The proposed SHO algorithm was tested in a two-region power system containing a photovoltaic system and a reheat thermal unit under three different scenarios. In the first scenario, the frequency response of the algorithm to a 0.1 p.u. load change in both regions was examined. In the second scenario, the algorithm's frequency response to sudden load changes from 0.1 p.u. to 0.4 p.u. was tested. Finally, the algorithm's frequency response was examined against different levels of solar irradiance for sensitivity analysis. This study compared the performance of the SHO-optimized controller with the optimization algorithms reported in the literature, including the Genetic Algorithm (GA), Firefly Algorithm (FA), Whale Optimization Algorithm (WOA), and Modified Whale Optimization Algorithm (MWOA). In this context, the optimization of PI controller gain parameters based on the ITAE metric resulted in SHO algorithm achieving the best performance with values of 2.5308, followed by WOA at 4.1211, FA at 7.4259, and GA at 12.1244. In tests, SHO significantly outperformed these algorithms in key performance metrics, such as Settling Time, Overshoot (M+), and Undershoot (M-). Specifically, SHO achieved 98.94% better overshoot and 85.25% reduced undershoot than GA, and concluded settling times 52.79% faster than GA in the first scenario. Similar superior outcomes were noted in subsequent tests. These results underline SHO's efficacy in enhancing system stability and control performance, marking it as a significant advancement over conventional LFC methods.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Andiç et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e6b291b6db643587633e2chttps://doi.org/10.31763/ijrcs.v4i2.1341
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1A new approach for solving global optimization and engineering problems based on modified Sea Horse Optimizer2024
  2. 2An Improved Sinh Cosh Optimizer Based 2-Degree-of-Freedom Double Integral Feedback PID Controller for Power System Load Frequency Control2026 · 1 citations
  3. 3Spider Wasp Optimizer-Optimized Cascaded Fractional-Order Controller for Load Frequency Control in a Photovoltaic-Integrated Two-Area System2024 · 39 citations
  4. 4Load frequency control of interconnected power systems based on improved whale optimization algorithm2024
  5. 5Terminal Voltage and Load Frequency Regulation in a Nonlinear Four-Area Multi-Source Interconnected Power System via Arithmetic Optimization Algorithm2025 · 7 citations