The parameters of a Pitt-Peters dynamic inflow model for a rotor undergoing collective inputs were extracted from experimental measurements on a hovering rotor. The four-bladed rotor of 2 m diameter featured straight, untwisted blades and a solidity of σ = 0.010. The nominal trim condition was CT /σ = 0.07 at a speed of 840 RPM. The rotor wake was measured using phase-resolved, 2D, 3-component particle image velocimetry (PIV) over a large region of interest (0.84 m x 0.77 m), and the integrated rotor aerodynamic forces were obtained from simultaneous hub loads measurements. The frequency response of rotor inflow to rotor thrust was found by measuring the system response to a stepped-sine collective input, which included frequencies of 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.6, and 0.7/rev. The thrust amplitude increased with input frequency, reaching 27.4% of the steady thrust at the highest input frequency. The inflow amplitude was 4.3% of the steady inflow at 0.2/rev and decreased to 2.0% at 0.7/rev. A first-order transfer function was fit to the discrete frequency response to compute the parameters of the Pitt-Peters dynamic inflow model. The apparent mass term for a rotor undergoing collective inputs was found to be M11 = 0.0288±4.4% and the gain term was found to be ¯L11 = 0.118±6.3%. The results agreed well with examples in literature extracted from high-fidelity numerical models. However, there were differences in the steady-state gain and the frequency at which the inflow magnitude is attenuated. The methodology for extending the present approach to cyclic inflow components is presented.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yu et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: