Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We have studied the mass spectra of the <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><a:mi>P</a:mi></a:math>-wave fully charm and fully bottom tetraquark states in the framework of quantum chromodynamics (QCD) sum rules. We construct the interpolating currents by inserting the covariant derivative operator <c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><c:msub><c:mover accent="true"><c:mi mathvariant="script">D</c:mi><c:mo stretchy="false">↔</c:mo></c:mover><c:mi>μ</c:mi></c:msub></c:math> between the S-wave diquark and antidiquark fields. The excitation structures show that the pure <h:math xmlns:h="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><h:mi>λ</h:mi></h:math>-mode excited <j:math xmlns:j="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><j:mi>P</j:mi></j:math>-wave fully heavy tetraquarks exist for the quantum numbers <l:math xmlns:l="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><l:msup><l:mi>J</l:mi><l:mrow><l:mi>P</l:mi><l:mi>C</l:mi></l:mrow></l:msup><l:mo>=</l:mo><l:msup><l:mn>1</l:mn><l:mrow><l:mo>−</l:mo><l:mo>−</l:mo></l:mrow></l:msup><l:mo>,</l:mo><l:msup><l:mn>1</l:mn><l:mrow><l:mo>−</l:mo><l:mo>+</l:mo></l:mrow></l:msup><l:mo>,</l:mo><l:msup><l:mn>2</l:mn><l:mrow><l:mo>−</l:mo><l:mo>−</l:mo></l:mrow></l:msup><l:mo>,</l:mo><l:msup><l:mn>2</l:mn><l:mrow><l:mo>−</l:mo><l:mo>+</l:mo></l:mrow></l:msup></l:math>, and <n:math xmlns:n="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><n:msup><n:mn>3</n:mn><n:mrow><n:mo>−</n:mo><n:mo>−</n:mo></n:mrow></n:msup></n:math>, while it is difficult to separate the <p:math xmlns:p="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><p:mi>λ</p:mi></p:math>-mode and <r:math xmlns:r="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><r:mi>ρ</r:mi></r:math>-mode excitations in the <t:math xmlns:t="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><t:msup><t:mn>0</t:mn><t:mrow><t:mo>−</t:mo><t:mo>+</t:mo></t:mrow></t:msup></t:math> channel. Within three Lorentz indices, there is no pure <v:math xmlns:v="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><v:mi>λ</v:mi></v:math>-mode excited <x:math xmlns:x="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><x:mi>P</x:mi></x:math>-wave fully charm/bottom tetraquark operators with <z:math xmlns:z="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><z:msup><z:mi>J</z:mi><z:mrow><z:mi>P</z:mi><z:mi>C</z:mi></z:mrow></z:msup><z:mo>=</z:mo><z:msup><z:mn>0</z:mn><z:mrow><z:mo>−</z:mo><z:mo>−</z:mo></z:mrow></z:msup></z:math> and <bb:math xmlns:bb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><bb:msup><bb:mn>3</bb:mn><bb:mrow><bb:mo>−</bb:mo><bb:mo>+</bb:mo></bb:mrow></bb:msup></bb:math>. Our results support that the recent observed <db:math xmlns:db="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><db:mi>X</db:mi><db:mo stretchy="false">(</db:mo><db:mn>6900</db:mn><db:mo stretchy="false">)</db:mo></db:math> and <hb:math xmlns:hb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><hb:mi>X</hb:mi><hb:mo stretchy="false">(</hb:mo><hb:mn>7200</hb:mn><hb:mo stretchy="false">)</hb:mo></hb:math> resonances could be interpreted as the <lb:math xmlns:lb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><lb:mi>P</lb:mi></lb:math>-wave fully charm <nb:math xmlns:nb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><nb:mi>c</nb:mi><nb:mi>c</nb:mi><nb:mover accent="true"><nb:mi>c</nb:mi><nb:mo stretchy="false">¯</nb:mo></nb:mover><nb:mover accent="true"><nb:mi>c</nb:mi><nb:mo stretchy="false">¯</nb:mo></nb:mover></nb:math> tetraquark states with <tb:math xmlns:tb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><tb:msup><tb:mi>J</tb:mi><tb:mrow><tb:mi>P</tb:mi><tb:mi>C</tb:mi></tb:mrow></tb:msup><tb:mo>=</tb:mo><tb:msup><tb:mn>1</tb:mn><tb:mrow><tb:mo>−</tb:mo><tb:mo>+</tb:mo></tb:mrow></tb:msup></tb:math> and <vb:math xmlns:vb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><vb:msup><vb:mn>2</vb:mn><vb:mrow><vb:mo>−</vb:mo><vb:mo>+</vb:mo></vb:mrow></vb:msup></vb:math>, respectively. Some <xb:math xmlns:xb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><xb:mi>P</xb:mi></xb:math>-wave fully bottom <zb:math xmlns:zb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><zb:mi>b</zb:mi><zb:mi>b</zb:mi><zb:mover accent="true"><zb:mi>b</zb:mi><zb:mo stretchy="false">¯</zb:mo></zb:mover><zb:mover accent="true"><zb:mi>b</zb:mi><zb:mo stretchy="false">¯</zb:mo></zb:mover></zb:math> tetraquark states are predicted to be lower than the di-<fc:math xmlns:fc="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><fc:msub><fc:mi>η</fc:mi><fc:mi>b</fc:mi></fc:msub><fc:mo stretchy="false">(</fc:mo><fc:mn>1</fc:mn><fc:mi>S</fc:mi><fc:mo stretchy="false">)</fc:mo></fc:math> and di-<jc:math xmlns:jc="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><jc:mi mathvariant="normal">ϒ</jc:mi><jc:mo stretchy="false">(</jc:mo><jc:mn>1</jc:mn><jc:mi>S</jc:mi><jc:mo stretchy="false">)</jc:mo></jc:math> mass thresholds. Hopefully our calculations will be useful for identifying the nature of new exotic tetraquark states.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: