Two recent fieldwork expeditions to Peru and Ecuador resulted in the finding of two Carex species ( C. hypsipedos and C. sanctae-marthae ) previously known from a single collection each, and of uncertain morphological and systematic affinities. We performed phylogenetic analyses using barcode molecular markers and a detailed morphological comparison among the new specimens and the original collections. A BLAST search was used to obtain the preliminary infrageneric affinities of problematic samples. Phylogenetic results confirmed the adscription of these species to two sectional Carex groups: Carex sect. Racemosae (subg. Carex ) for C. hypsipedos and Carex sect. Junciformes (subg. Psyllophorae ) for C. sanctae-marthae. Morphological revision revealed unique traits in C. hypsipedos , especially geocarpy, here strikingly reported for the first time for the genus Carex . On the other hand, the careful comparison of the new materials of C. sanctae-marthae revealed unequivocal affinities with the type, confirming its identity as this species. Our work illustrated that for the understanding of poorly known groups, such as these two Neotropical Carex , integrative approaches combining basic biosystematics tools are still very necessary: field and herbaria surveys and DNA barcode.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alonso et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: