A paper that describes a new reaction will almost always include a table of compounds that researchers tested their protocol on. But a chemist's choice of substrates can introduce bias into their study. The chemist might avoid testing a potentially useful substrate because it's expensive or might reach for a substrate lying around their lab rather than order something new. Plus, synthesis papers don't typically report substrates that researchers test but don't work, which can provide valuable information about a protocol. Frank Glorius and his group at the University of Münster are among the researchers who have been thinking about ways to improve substrate selection . The group is now releasing a web tool to help chemists pick substrates ( ACS Cent. Sci. 2024, DOI: 10.1021/acscentsci.3c01638 ). The researchers think the tool could enable more meaningful comparisons between different reaction protocols. The researchers' first step in the process was to
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
special to C EN Sam Lemonick (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: