Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Machine learning study demonstrates causal inference enhances hypertension detection from noninvasive cardiac signals, indicating causality outperforms correlation.
BACKGROUND Hypertension is a leading cause of cardiovascular disease and premature death worldwide and it puts a heavy burden on the healthcare system. It is, therefore, very important to detect and evaluate hypertension and related cardiovascular events so as for early prevention, detection and management. Hypertension can be evaluated in real time with wearable noninvasive cardiac signals, such as electrocardiogram (ECG) and photoplethysmogram (PPG). Most previous studies predicted hypertension from ECG and PPG signals with extracted features that are correlated with hypertension. However, correlation is sometimes unreliable and may be affected by confounding factors. OBJECTIVE In this study, we explored the feasibility of predicting the risk of hypertension using causal inference methods. Additionally, we paid special attention to and verified the reliability and effectiveness of causality compared to correlation. METHODS Firstly, we constructed causal graphs by the Greedy Equivalence Search algorithm, and then applied causal strategies to obtain the optimal causal graph. Finally, we used machine learning classification algorithms to achieve hypertension prediction. RESULTS The machine learning classification models achieve great classification performance, with accuracy being 0.89, precision being 0.92, recall being 0.82, and F1-score being 0.87, which outperformed the correlation-based hypertension detection. CONCLUSIONS The results indicate that the causal inference-based approach can potentially clarify the mechanism of hypertension detec-tion with noninvasive signal and effectively detect hyperten-sion. In addition, the results also reveal that causality is more reliable and effective compared to correlation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
G et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: