⌘+K

Pulse Explore Clubs Researchers Journals

Home Clubs Explore

May 3, 2024JBI Evidence Implementation

Comparison of two audit and feedback approaches: descriptive analysis of personal and contextual dynamics

Maria Pagano Irene Cappadona Francesco Corallo Davide Cardile Augusto Ielo Giangaetano D’Aleo Maria Cristina De Cola Placido Bramanti Rosella Ciurleo

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Abstract

Audit and feedback (A&F) is a systematic intervention that can be used to improve the quality of health care. The EASY-NET Network Project proposes an innovative A&F model.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Pagano et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e6ba6ab6db64358763b0fc https://doi.org/10.1097/xeb.0000000000000428

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Keep reading

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1How to Design Effective Audit and Feedback Interventions With Nurses2024 · 2 citations
2Do medical specialists accept claims-based Audit and Feedback for quality improvement? A focus group study2024 · 1 citations
3Implementation of an audit and feedback module targeting low-value clinical practices in a provincial trauma quality assurance program: a cost-effectiveness study2024 · 4 citations
4Exploring equity in audit and feedback trials: Secondary analysis of a systematic reviewSystematic Review · 2026 · 1 citations
5Factors determining the effectiveness of audit & feedback on clinical guideline adherence of hospital-based medical specialists: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trialsClinical Guideline · 2026