This paper contextualizes the Dobbs v. Jackson decision within the history of how children have been used, literally and symbolically, as commodities, to serve political, economic and religious goals. Also examined are attitudes toward women and moral decision-making, and motives behind state interference in reproductive choice. Focus is placed on the promotion of adoption, by some anti-abortion activists, as the moral alternative to abortion. The recent activities of some evangelical Christian groups to deploy adoption as a way to increase their numbers, as well as the Spanish government's history of stealing babies from anti-government mothers, and the history in the U.S. of the use of sterilization as a purported means of reducing poverty, are offered as evidence. Suggestions are made for how psychoanalysis might expand theory to include the role of the social unconscious, particularly in understanding the development of female subjectivity and a woman's capacity to make moral/ethical choices for herself.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sally Bjorklund (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: