This article uncovers power dynamics in shadow and daytime education in China, indicating new frameworks for policymaking.
Most research bodies rest on a fixed boundary between daytime and shadow education until some recent literature investigates their dyadic relationships. Ineffective policies toward shadow education often come when countries fail to understand such relationships. With the nomadic inquiry, this article aims to reshape the whole landscape of daytime and shadow education under the double reduction policy (DRP) in China using the Foucaultian and Deleuze & Guattari's frameworks with policymaking implications. Firstly, it depicts key features of the transboundary learning culture and schooling system (TLCS) connecting daytime and shadow education and uncovers those power relations among state and non-state actors under DRP in China. Secondly, it addresses crossing-over research boundaries using the nomadic inquiry from international perspectives. Notably, traditional research agendas in daytime education can be “transferred” into shadow education and even to the whole realm of TLCS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kwok et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: