No benefit of direct anterior over posterolateral approach in total hip arthroplasty using dual-mobility acetabular component for femoral neck fracture

Henri Peuchot; Christophe Jacquet; Maxime Fabre‐Aubrespy; David Ferguson; Matthieu Ollivier; Xavier Flécher; Jean‐Noël Argenson

doi:10.1302/0301-620x.106b5.bjj-2023-0832.r1

May 1, 2024The Bone & Joint Journal

No benefit of direct anterior over posterolateral approach in total hip arthroplasty using dual-mobility acetabular component for femoral neck fracture

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Key Points

Comparative assessment of direct anterior and posterolateral surgical techniques evaluated early functional recovery and joint stability in femoral neck fractures.
Highlights that choice of surgical approach may not influence clinical recovery when using dual mobility acetabular components to manage acute femoral neck fractures.

Abstract

Dual-mobility acetabular components (DMCs) have improved total hip arthroplasty (THA) stability in femoral neck fractures (FNFs). In osteoarthritis, the direct anterior approach (DAA) has been promoted for improving early functional results compared with the posterolateral approach (PLA). The aim of this study was to compare these two approaches in FNF using DMC-THA.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Peuchot et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e6c03bb6db64358763fb35 https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.106b5.bjj-2023-0832.r1

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

No benefit of direct anterior over posterolateral approach in total hip arthroplasty using dual-mobility acetabular component for femoral neck fracture

Key Points

Abstract

Discussion

Cite This Study

No benefit of direct anterior over posterolateral approach in total hip arthroplasty using dual-mobility acetabular component for femoral neck fracture

Key Points

Abstract

Discussion

Cite This Study

Keep reading

Keep reading