This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
In TROPION-Breast01 (NCT05104866), the antibody-drug conjugate Dato-DXd showed improved efficacy and was well tolerated compared with investigator's choice of CT (ICC) in patients (pts) with HR+/HER2– BC. Here we report additional safety analyses. Study design was previously described; safety was a secondary endpoint. Mouthwash use was advised (steroid mouthwash strongly recommended if available), and ophthalmologic assessment was required per regulatory request at screening and every three 21-day cycles. At data cutoff (Jul 2023), 360 pts received Dato-DXd, 351 ICC. Median treatment duration was longer with Dato-DXd vs ICC (6.7 vs 4.1 mo). Rate of ≥G3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) was lower with Dato-DXd vs ICC (21% vs 45%). TRAEs of special interest (AESIs) with Dato-DXd included stomatitis/oral mucositis (OM) (56%), ocular events (OE; 40%), and adjudicated drug-related interstitial lung disease (ILD; 3%). OE were identified mainly via mandatory eye exams; >50% were dry eye. Stomatitis/OM and OE were mostly low grade (asymptomatic/mild, G1 in 25% and 32% of all Dato-DXd pts, respectively); both were well managed by toxicity management guidelines (TMGs), with low rates of dose interruption (1% and 3%) and discontinuation (both 0.3%). In contrast, the ICC safety profile was most notable for high-grade neutropenia (≥G3 in 31% of ICC pts) leading to dose interruption (17%)/reduction (13%). Adjudicated drug-related ILD with Dato-DXd was mostly low grade (asymptomatic, G1 in 1% of Dato-DXd pts). AESIs generally occurred in the first few cycles: median onset of stomatitis/OM at Cycle 2, OE at Cycle 3, ILD at Cycle 4. Median time to resolution was 37, 67, 28 days for stomatitis/OM, OE, ILD. Further data from TROPION-Breast01 showed that AESIs with Dato-DXd were typically low grade, occurred in the first few cycles and were manageable using TMGs. Moreover, with Dato-DXd the rate of ≥G3 TRAEs was less than half that with ICC and fewer TRAEs led to dose interruption/reduction, showing that Dato-DXd offers better tolerability vs ICC and further emphasizing the potential for Dato-DXd as a favourable treatment option in clinical practice.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jhaveri et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: