Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study assessed the accuracy of a smartphone telematics algorithm that classifies car trips as driver or non-driver. Participants' trips were measured for 4 weeks by Way to Drive, a research telematics application that uses the same data algorithms as leading auto-insurance companies. At the end of each week, participants completed a survey prompting them to review trips within the app and report time and nature of any misclassified trips. Overall accuracy of driver vs. non-driver classification was high (96.5 %, SD = 5.1 %). Sensitivity, the percentage of actual driver trips classified as such, was also high (97.5 %, SD = 4.6 %). Specificity, the percentage of non-driver trips classified as such, was slightly lower and more variable (91.2 %, SD = 14.8 %). The algorithm's accuracy was generally robust to a variety of phone characteristics, vehicle features, and driving habits.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ebert et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: