Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In traditional wastewater treatment, ozone injection efficiency is low. There is a need for the quantitative preparation of ozone-based microfine bubbles to balance bubble stability and ozone reactivity. To address this, we developed coaxial and T-type ozone-based microfine bubble generators and conducted experiments to compare their bubble production effects. The more effective generator was then compared with the traditional aeration method. The results indicate the following: 1. The coaxial type is more effective in producing ozone-based microfine bubbles. 2. The bubbles produced by the coaxial type have an average diameter of 0.2–0.4 mm and a residence time of ∼2 min, meeting microfine bubble standards. Experimental data analysis shows compliance with the force process and bubble growth mechanism under coaxial flow, meeting the requirements for quantitative and controllable ozone-based microfine bubble production. 3. Ozone bubbles from the coaxial method surpass those from traditional aeration in volume and concentration. More than 99.73% are microfine bubbles, with an ozone concentration of ∼84.5%. 4. The coaxial method more effectively reduces COD values in water, contributing to efficient wastewater treatment. This research presents new avenues for efficient sewage treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huang et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: