Scholarship on vulnerable groups in coaching is growing.Yet, there are no specific ethical frameworks focused on guiding researchers and practitioners in researching coaching among vulnerable groups.This theoretical article addresses this gap by developing a framework to depict the multiple dimensions of ethical decision-making when working with vulnerable groups in coaching research.It contends that focus on the tensions emerging through the dual role of practitioner and researcher in coaching research is key to navigating ethical decision-making.The article also identifies 'vulnerable groups' as worthy of study within coaching research as a means to bolster the evidence base for coaching and to address scholarship's biases towards more privileged groups.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Collins et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: