Reduced mean systemic to pulmonary artery pressure ratio (MAP/PAP), a marker of global cardiac dysfunction and adverse outcomes, is unstudied in balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). A total of 65 subjects underwent 6 BPA sessions at UC San Diego. Pre- and post-BPA MAP/PAP, 6-minute walking distance (6MWD) and WHO functional class (FC) were measured. T-test, ANOVA, chi-square, and receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curve tests were used. P-value <0.05 was significant. "Responders" improved from WHO FC III/IV to I/II after BPA. "Non-responders" had unchanged WHO FC III/IV after BPA. Overall mean MAP/PAP improved from 2.2±0.69 to 2.7±0.92 after BPA (p<0.001). MAP/PAP <2.5 was associated with FC III/IV (area 0.698; p=0.002), more frequent FC III/IV symptoms (60.1% vs 32.7%, p<0.001) and shorter 6MWD (410±117 vs 481±127 meters; p=0.003) versus MAP/PAP ≥2.5. Stepwise reduction of mean MAP/PAP was observed with higher WHO FC (I/II/III/IV: 3.2±1.13, 2.7±0.83, 2.3±0.64, 1.9±0.22; p<0.001) (Figure A). MAP/PAP in BPA "responders" vs "non-responders" was similar at baseline (2.2±0.67 vs 2.0±0.51; p=0.279), but higher after BPA (2.8±0.81 vs 2.3±0.48; p=0.047), respectively. MAP/PAP increased to a greater degree after BPA among "responders" (2.2±0.67 to 2.8±0.81; p=0.006) than "non-responders" (2.0±0.51 to 2.3±0.48, p=0.061) (Figure B). Higher MAP/PAP in subjects undergoing BPA is associated with superior physical function. MAP/PAP increased stepwise across treatment sessions in the overall BPA cohort and may help identify "responders" to BPA therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Leyva et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: