Key result
Balloon pulmonary angioplasty yielded inferior hemodynamic benefits in post-pulmonary endarterectomy patients compared to inoperable CTEPH patients (ΔPVR -13.9% vs -27.9%, p<0.05).
Why the study?
It was unclear whether post-PEA CTEPH patients treated by BPA derive similar benefit to those with inoperable CTEPH.
Does balloon pulmonary angioplasty improve hemodynamics differently in post-pulmonary endarterectomy patients compared to inoperable CTEPH patients?
Cohort (n=109)
Does balloon pulmonary angioplasty improve hemodynamics differently in post-pulmonary endarterectomy patients compared to inoperable CTEPH patients?
Absolute Event Rate: -13.9% vs -27.9%
p-value: p=<0.05
Balloon pulmonary angioplasty provides significantly less hemodynamic benefit in patients with residual pulmonary hypertension after pulmonary endarterectomy compared to those with inoperable CTEPH.
BPA may yield comparable gains in residual post-PEA CTEPH as in inoperable disease; leaves open predictors of response and durability.
Pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) may not achieve full clearance of vascular obstructions in patients with more distal chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). Balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) may be indicated to treat these residual vascular lesions. We compared whether patients post‐PEA (PP) treated by BPA derived similar benefit to those who had inoperable CTEPH (IC), and assessed predictors of BPA response after surgery. We treated 109 patients with BPA—89 with IC and 20 PP. Serial right heart catheterization performed at baseline (immediately before BPA) and 3 months after completing BPA, compared pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR), mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) as well as change in WHO functional class and 6‐minute walk distance. We also assessed the impact of total thrombus tail length (TTTL) from photographed PEA surgical specimens and PP computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA)‐quantified residual disease burden on BPA response. PP and IC groups did not differ significantly in terms of demographics, baseline hemodynamics or procedural characteristics. However, IC derived greater hemodynamic benefit from BPA: ΔPVR (−27.9 ± 20.2% vs. −13.9 ± 23.9%, p < 0.05) and ΔmPAP (−17.1 ± 14.4% vs. −8.5 ± 18.0%, p < 0.05). There was a negative correlation between pre‐BPA PVR and TTTL (r = −0.47, p < 0.05) which persisted post‐BPA. PVR, mPAP, WHO FC and 6MWD were not improved significantly post‐BPA in PP patients. BPA response was not related to TTTL terciles or CTPA‐quantified residual disease burden. Patients PP experienced inferior response to BPA, despite similar baseline and procedural characteristics to IC. BPA does not abolish the relationship between TTTL and postsurgical PVR in PP patients, suggesting that BPA is less effective in treating residual PH after surgery in an experienced surgical center.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kirkby et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) (n=109). Post-pulmonary endarterectomy status vs. Inoperable CTEPH status was evaluated on Change in pulmonary vascular resistance (ΔPVR) (p=<0.05). Balloon pulmonary angioplasty yielded inferior hemodynamic benefits in post-pulmonary endarterectomy patients compared to inoperable CTEPH patients (ΔPVR -13.9% vs -27.9%, p<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: