The use of ECMO for hemodynamic (HD) support is becoming increasingly prevalent. While potentially life-saving, ECMO use has its complications. We aim to assess the safety of ECMO use for older population through this retrospective analysis. The national readmission database (2016-2020) was utilized to identify hospitalizations requiring ECMO. Cohorts were stratified based by age. A Propensity Score Matching (PSM) model matched young (age <65) & older (age ≥65) patients. Pearson's x2 test was applied to PSM-2 matched cohorts to compare outcomes. Among 40,984 hospitalizations requiring ECMO; About 29.2% (N: 11,991) patients were in older age group. After propensity matching (N: 5,993), older patients had higher mortality (34.03% vs 25.35%, aOR:1.33, p<0.001), acute myocardial infarction (MI) (23% vs 14.4%, aOR:1.53, p<0.001), post-procedural bleeding (6.7% vs 5.3%, aOR:1.19, p:0.001), transfusion requirement (25.5% vs 21.9%, aOR: 1.26, p<0.001) & MACE risk (aOR:1.30, p<0.001). From 2016-2020: Mortality has increased significantly in both age groups. In younger patients, mortality has increased from 3.6% in 2016 to 35.6% in 2020 (p-trend<0.01); In older group, mortality has increased from 7% in 2016 to 43.1% in 2020 (p-trend: <0.001). Younger patients on the other hand, were more likely to be readmitted at 90-day (24.4% vs 20.5%, p<0.001) & 180-day (28% vs 24.5%, p:0.003). Older patients placed on ECMO have higher mortality & post-procedural bleeding even on propensity-matched cohort. A worrisome up-trend has been noticed in mortality rates in both age groups in recent years.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kumar et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: