PURPOSE: We investigated whether obesity should be considered for breast reduction (BR) by examining the surgical outcomes and QoL across different weight classes, aiming to pinpoint when outcomes become less favorable. METHODS: Patients undergoing BR by two surgeons from 2016-2022 were included. BMI cohorts were formed according to CDC guidelines: obesity class I (30-34.9 kg/m2), obesity class II (35-39.9 kg/m2) and obesity class III (> 40 kg/m2). QoL was assessed by comparing pre- and postoperative BREAST-Q BR scores within cohorts. A comparison analysis was performed between weight classes (I vs II vs III, II vs III) RESULTS: 461 BR patients were identified (I: 142, II: 39, III: 19). As BMI increased, percentage of Black patients, procedure length, weight of tissue removed, and inferior pedicle technique all significantly increased (p<0.001). Obesity class III cohort had significantly higher rates of SSI (I: 1.4%, II: 0%, III: 15.8%, p<0.01), fat necrosis (I: 7%, II: 0%, III: 22.2%, p=0.01), dehiscence (I: 2.1%, II: 5.1%, III: 31.6%, p<0.01), minor T-point breakdown (I: 23.9%, II: 23.1%, III: 52.6%, p=0.01), and reoperations (I: 6.3%, II: 15.4%, III: 21.1%, p<0.05). When comparing class III to class I and class II independently, class III was associated with unfavorable outcomes (p<0.05). Significant improvement in average postoperative QoL scores in satisfaction with breast, psychosocial well-being, sexual well-being, and physical well-being were seen in all cohorts except class III (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Counseling patients in obesity class III demands utmost caution, thoroughly weighing the risks and benefits before recommending breast reduction surgery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ewing et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: