PURPOSE: This retrospective study details the surgical anatomy of harvesting a local fasciocutaneous propeller flap for osteocutaneous fibula flap donor site closure and compares outcomes to patients who underwent skin graft closure. METHODS: The study compared 21 patients who underwent local flap reconstruction compared to 195 patients who underwent skin graft for fibula flap donor site reconstruction. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the two groups based on age, BMI, presence of peripheral vascular disease, obesity, or type 2 DM. All propeller flap closures were eccentrically designed on a proximal lower leg perforator. The average distance of this perforator from the fibular head was 13.4±2.0 cm. Most of these perforators were musculocutaneous through the soleus muscle (n=19, 90.5%) and the rest were septocutaneous (n=2, 9.5%) originating directly from the peroneal artery. The average defect size was 69.9±28.3 cm2 and the average propeller flap size was 80.3±26.2cm2. Three patients experienced distal partial flap loss and one patient required additional full-thickness skin graft. All other patients achieved complete healing. In comparison, the average skin graft size was 65.3±31.9cm2. Half of patients (n=96, 49.2%) patients had incomplete skin graft take. The average skin graft loss was 34.3% and the average length of dressing changes required was 51.6±52.8 days. CONCLUSION: The study findings demonstrate that local propeller flaps can be utilized with reasonable success to close fibula flap donor sites and are preferred to skin graft closure when anatomically feasible.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: