PURPOSE: Tessier craniofacial clefts are rare malformations that may carry significant functional and aesthetic pathology. This study examines orbital and ocular outcomes of craniofacial clefts. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of children with rare craniofacial clefts from 1993-2023. Primary outcomes were surgical burden, perioperative complications, ocular findings, and visual acuity. Clefts were grouped into superior periorbital (Tessier #9-11), inferior periorbital (3-6, 8), superior midline (12-14), inferior midline (0-2, 30), and lateral (7). RESULTS: Among 147 children, 75 (51%) had peri-orbital, 40 (27%) medial, and 65 (44%) lateral clefts. Mean age at first surgery was 3.6 ± 5.0 years. 26% underwent eyelid surgery, 25% underwent orbital surgery, and 25% underwent medial or lateral canthopexy. Periorbital cleft was associated with eyelid coloboma (17%) and retraction (12%); superior cleft with ocular surface pathology (88%), nasolacrimal duct obstruction (63%), hypertelorism (38%), lagophthalmos (25%) and ectropion (25%); inferior cleft with eyelid coloboma (18%), eyelid retraction (13%), lagophthalmos (11%), and ectropion (11%); medial cleft with microphthalmos/anophthalmos (25%), hypertelorism (22%); and superior medial cleft with entropion (14%). Among 254 eyes of 127 patients (mean age 9.8 (SD 7.3) years), 72% had "Good", 11% "Fair", and 18% "Poor" acuity. Primary causes of poor acuity included microphthalmia/anophthalmia (46%), optic nerve hypoplasia/atrophy (14%), corneal scarring from exposure/entropion (13%), optic nerve/retinal coloboma (9%), strabismus/refractive amblyopia (9%), post-operative orbital apex syndrome (5%), cataract (2%) and cryptophthalmos (2%). CONCLUSION: Children with rare craniofacial clefts commonly have orbital or ocular disease that may require multidisciplinary treatment, including eyelid, strabismus, or orbital surgery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ng et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: