Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE:Venous congestion of deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps can be resolved with intra-flap anastomosis to the superficial inferior epigastric vein (SIEV). This requires retrograde venous flow through the vena comitans (VC) of the DIEP. One-way valves can block this flow unless the VCs share communicating branches. Our study determines the incidence of patent retrograde flow through DIEPs. METHODS: In patients receiving DIEP flap reconstruction, communication between VCs was tested using a heparin flush. Luminal diameter of each VC was recorded. Flow patterns were compared using Chi-Squared goodness-of-fit. RESULTS: Thirty-seven DIEP flaps from 20 patients were studied. Each DIEP showed patent VC connections, except for two that only contained a single VC. Of the remaining 35 flaps, the average luminal VC diameter was 2.38mm, commonly with one larger VC. Sixty-nine percent of perforators had communicative flow bidirectionally, between both VCs. Twenty-six percent had flow from the smaller VC to the larger, and 2 flaps had flow from the larger to the smaller (p=0.000). CONCLUSION: Utilization of a heparin flush identified patent VC communication prior to SIEV anastomosis. Retrograde venous flow through the DIEP is a reliable salvage pathway, though the smaller vena comitans is a more dependable anastomotic option.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sarrami et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: