PURPOSE: This national database study compares wide-awake hand surgeries in the United States performed in the operating room and office in terms of volume, reimbursement, opioid prescriptions, and adverse events. METHODS: Patients with trigger finger release, carpal tunnel release, De Quervain's release, and mucous cyst excision were identified in PearlDiver (2010-2020). Exclusion criteria were concomitant hand surgery, sedation/monitored anesthesia, inpatient setting, follow-up <30 days, and age <18 years. Cohorts were stratified by surgical setting then matched by age, sex, Elixhauser Comorbidity Index score, and region. Primary endpoints included total and physician reimbursement and 30-day opioid prescriptions, emergency department visits, and surgical site infections. RESULTS: Between 2010 and 2020, the proportion of surgeries performed in the office increased. Office-based surgery demonstrated lower total and physician reimbursement. Following office-based surgery, patients filled fewer opioid prescriptions (p<0.001) with fewer emergency department visits and similar rates of surgical site infections. CONCLUSION: Office-based hand surgery is increasing in popularity. With reduced financial burden and opioid prescriptions and favorable rates of adverse events, office-based wide-awake hand surgery may provide better healthcare value for certain procedures, and more surgeries should be performed in the office when possible.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kammien et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: