PURPOSE: The cleft lip nasal deformity is challenging both aesthetically and functionally. This study examines nasal outcomes of cleft rhinoplasties. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent rhinoplasty for cleft lip nasal deformity from 2006-2023. Primary outcomes were surgical burden and perioperative complications. Rhinoplasties were grouped into primary, occurring concurrent to definitive lip repair; intermediate, between lip repair and age 12; and definitive, at age 12 or older. RESULTS: Among 1170 rhinoplasties, 497 (42%) were primary, 364 (31%) intermediate, and 309 (26%) definitive. Mean age at surgery were 0.45±0.29, 7.8±1.7, and 17.3±4.2 years, respectively. Intermediate rhinoplasties utilized the following: no graft/implant, 40%; iliac crest cartilage graft, 44%; ear cartilage, 10%; resorbable plate, 5%. Use of iliac crest graft predicted fewer subsequent rhinoplasties (-0.168, SE 0.061, p=0.006). The proportion of iliac crest graft intermediate rhinoplasties increased over time (0.036, SE 0.007, p<0.001). Graft/implant use in definitive rhinoplasty was distributed as follows: nasal, 47%; no graft/implant, 21%; rib, 10%; ear, 12%; resorbable plate, 5%; iliac crest, 4%; and cadaver, 0.4%. Rib graft rhinoplasties had more perioperative complications (28% versus 2%, p<0.001). The cohort with follow up to skeletal maturity (n=89) had a median of 2 (range 1-8) lifetime rhinoplasties, with no difference in number of subsequent rhinoplasties between cohorts who did/did not undergo primary rhinoplasty (1.8 versus 1.8, p=0.996). Mean follow-up period was 8.4±6.0 years. CONCLUSION: Improved understanding of cleft rhinoplasty outcomes may alleviate some of the functional, aesthetic, and psychosocial challenges among patients with cleft nasal deformities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ng et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: