Despite recommendations for near universal use of remote monitoring (RM) in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED), there is a high geographical variability in the uptake and use of RM. The underlying reasons contributing to this geographic disparity remains largely unknown.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ferrick et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: