Key result
Remote monitoring for patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices reduces hospital visits and costs, and improves early detection of arrhythmias and device malfunctions.
Why the study?
Does remote monitoring improve follow-up and management in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices?
Does remote monitoring improve follow-up and management in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices?
Remote monitoring for cardiac implantable electronic devices improves clinic workflow, reduces costs, and enables early detection of clinical events, though reimbursement remains a barrier in some regions.
RM may optimize CIED follow-up workflow; leaves open optimal integration strategies for complex patients.
Follow-up of patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices is challenging due to the increasing number and technical complexity of devices coupled to increasing clinical complexity of patients. Remote monitoring (RM) offers the opportunity to optimise clinic workflow and to improve device monitoring and patient management. Several randomised clinical trials and registries have demonstrated that RM may reduce number of hospital visits, time required for patient follow-up, physician and nurse time, hospital and social costs. Furthermore, patient retention and adherence to follow-up schedule are significantly improved by RM. Continuous wireless monitoring of data stored in the device memory with automatic alerts allows early detection of device malfunctions and of events requiring clinical reaction, such as atrial fibrillation, ventricular arrhythmias and heart failure. Early reaction may improve patient outcome. RM is easy to use and patients showed a high level of acceptance and satisfaction. Implementing RM in daily practice may require changes in clinic workflow. To this purpose, new organisational models have been introduced. In spite of a favourable cost:benefit ratio, RM reimbursement still represents an issue in several European countries.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ricci et al. (2014) conducted a review in Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices. Remote monitoring was evaluated. Remote monitoring for patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices reduces hospital visits and costs, and improves early detection of arrhythmias and device malfunctions.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: