Background: Patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) exhibit locomotor muscle microvascular dysfunction due partly to reduced nitric oxide (NO) bioavailability. Tetrahydrobiopterin (BH 4 ) is a requisite cofactor for the enzymatic production of NO by NO synthase (NOS). BH 4 insuffciency promotes NOS uncoupling, which reduces NO production and augments cellular oxidative stress. Given the potential of BH 4 to improve NO bioavailability, we tested the hypothesis that short-term BH 4 administration would improve locomotor muscle microvascular function in patients with HFpEF. Methods: Eight patients with HFpEF (74±7 years; 31.3±4.9 kg/m 2 ) participated in a randomized, double-blind, crossover study, having consumed either BH 4 (Sapropterin, 10 mg/kg) or placebo for 10 days, separated by a 14-day washout period. Locomotor muscle microvascular function was assessed as leg blood flow (LBF) and leg vascular conductance (LVC) responses to passive leg movement (PLM) before (pre) and after (post) each treatment. PLM-induced LBF and LVC responses were expressed as peak change (Δpeak) or total hyperemic response (area under the curve above baseline; AUC). Results: LBF Δpeak did not change following BH 4 (267 ± 136 mL/min vs. 250 ± 101 mL/min) or placebo (317 ± 119 mL/min vs. 269 ± 97 mL/min) administration (pre vs. post; p>0.05). Similarly, LVC Δpeak was unchanged following either BH 4 (396 ± 165 mL/min/100mmHg vs. 465 ± 180 mL/min/100mmHg) or placebo (579 ± 238 mL/min/100mmHg vs. 496 ± 185 mL/min/100mmHg) administration (pre vs. post; p>0.05). The changes in LBF AUC and LVC AUC were not affected by either treatment (LBF AUC ; BH 4 : Δ91 ± 103 mL vs. Δ82 ± 69 mL; placebo: Δ148 ± 119 mL vs. Δ87 ± 81 mL; LVC AUC ; BH 4: Δ65 ± 55 mL/100mmHg vs. Δ98 ± 78 mL/100mnHg; placebo: Δ182 ± 127 mL/100mmHg vs. Δ105 ± 94 mL/100mmHg) (pre vs. post; p>0.05). Conclusion: Short-term BH 4 administration did not improve locomotor muscle microvascular function in patients with HFpEF. This project was funded, in part, by the National Institutes of Health (HL118313, D.W.W.; T32HL139451, K.B.; the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (I01RX001311, D.W.W.; IK2RX003670, to K.B.), and the American Heart Association (18POST33960192; K.B.). This is the full abstract presented at the American Physiology Summit 2024 meeting and is only available in HTML format. There are no additional versions or additional content available for this abstract. Physiology was not involved in the peer review process.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bunsawat et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: