Objective: Treatment specificities of hypertension in older adults remains a matter of debate. We therefore investigated the clinical practices on the treatment of hypertension in adults >75 years in ESH Excellence Centres (EC). Design and method: A survey with 24 questions was developed by the Working Group Hypertension in Older Adults and addressed to ESH-EC. The survey was questioning therapeutic strategies in treating hypertension in 4 groups of frailty/functionality status: Group 1: Fit, Group 2: Frail and Independent, Group 3: Frail and Dependent Group 4: End of Life. Results: Responses were received from 50 ESH excellence centres. The representatives of these centers who answered (one person per center) were mostly internists (42%), cardiologists (32%) and nephrologists (18%). A total of 48% of respondents stated that they always considered frailty status, whilst a further 48% said that they frequently consider frailty, usually based on general appearance of the patient (68%). The preferable SBP range was considered for the 4 groups. A SBP range of 130-139 mm Hg for Groups 1 and 2 was considered as optimal by 56% of respondents whereas for Group 3, 48% considered a SBP range of 140-149 mmHg and for Group 4, 56% considered SBP 150 mmHg or more as optimal. For Group 1, 46% and 48% of respondents respectively proposed combination therapy in all hypertensives and in grade 2-3 hypertensives. These percentages were respectively 8% and 66% for Group 2, 4%and 34% for Group 3, 2% and 12% for Group 4. When considering a reduction in antihypertensive treatment, 57% did not specify any tool, and 34% used START/STOPP criteria. For Group 1, 42% proposed treatment reduction when SBP was between 100-120 mmHg whereas 40% of the respondents reduced treatment only if SBP <100mmHg. In the 3 other groups about 74-80% proposed to reduce treatment when SBP<120 mmHg. Conclusions: As frailty increases, higher SBP targets are considered optimal; Nevertheless the use of validated tools to improve frailty stratification, is still not standardized.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Camafort et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: