Objective: Many individuals with hypertension remain undiagnosed and therefore untreated. Consequently, there is a pressing need to pinpoint patients at risk of developing hypertension to avoid cardiometabolic morbidity and mortality. We aimed to develop a predictive model for hypertension using diagnostic codes from prevailing electronic medical records in primary health care. Design and method: This sex- and age-matched case-control (1:5) study included patients aged 30–65 years living in Stockholm County, Sweden with a newly recorded diagnosis of hypertension during 2010–19 (cases) and individuals without a recorded hypertension diagnosis during 2010–19 (controls), in total 507,618 individuals. Patients with diagnoses of cardiovascular diseases or diabetes were excluded. A stochastic gradient boosting machine learning model was constructed using the 1,309 most registered ICD-10 codes from primary health care during the three years preceding the diagnosis of hypertension. Results: The model showed an area under the curve (95% confidence interval) of 0.748 (0.742–0.753) for females and 0.745 (0.740-0.751) for males for predicting newly diagnosed hypertension (Figures 1 and 2). The sensitivity was 63% and 68%, and the specificity 76% and 73%, for females and males, respectively (Table 1). The 25 diagnoses that contributed the most to the model for females and males all exhibited a normalized relative influence > 1%, as detailed in Tables 2a and 2b. The diagnoses contributing most to the model, all with an odds ratio of marginal effects > 1 for both sexes were dyslipidemia and obesity, along with people encountering health services in other circumstances, painful conditions, and anxiety. Conclusions: This machine learning model, developed with artificial intelligence based on earlier diagnoses within primary health care may contribute to identification of patients at risk of developing hypertension.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Norrman et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: