Objective: About 10% of patients with hypertension has elevated aldosterone-to-renin ratio and 50-70% of them have a negative confirmatory test for primary aldosteronism (PA). However, the appropriate follow-up of these patients is currently unknown. We investigated the incidence of PA in patients with previous negative confirmatory testing for PA, with a follow-up comprised between 2 and 8 years. Design and method: A total of 184 patients with a previously positive screening test for PA followed by a negative confirmatory test were enrolled in two hypertension centres: Torino and München. We repeated the screening test for PA and, if positive, the confirmatory test: either seated saline infusion test or captopril challenge test. Results: About 20% of patients had confirmed PA diagnosis after a mean follow-up of 5 years: 16% in Torino and 24% in München. When subtype diagnosis was offered systematically, 31% of patients displayed a unilateral form of PA. Patients with new onset of PA showed higher systolic blood pressure (142±17 versus 133±12 mmHg, P=0.005), diastolic blood pressure (89±8 versus 85±9 mmHg, P=0.007) and a higher rate of cardiac organ damage (60.9% versus 35.8%, P=0.031) than patients without PA, despite similar implementation of anti-hypertensive therapy. A mild progression of autonomous aldosterone secretion was present even in patients without confirmed PA, with increase of aldosterone post-saline infusion test (3.3 [2.3-4.3] versus 4.5 [3.5-5.4] ng/dL; P<0.001), but with relatively stable blood pressure levels. Among patients without PA, aldosterone post-saline infusion test at follow-up was positively associated with the follow-up time (β 0.262 [0.005; 0.520]; P=0.046). Conclusions: One fifth of patients with a negative confirmatory test for PA develop overt PA over time. A clinical follow-up of patients with a negative confirmatory test is advisable, along with the repetition of PA investigation, especially in patients with worsening of blood pressure control.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Buffolo et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: