Early rhythm control in patients with recently diagnosed atrial fibrillation: findings from the GLORIA-AF Registry Phase III

Abstract Background Early rhythm control (ERC) can improve outcomes in select patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) but real-world data are lacking. Purpose To evaluate the effectiveness of ERC in a real-world cohort of AF patients. Methods From the global, prospective GLORIA-AF Phase III Registry, adult patients with recent diagnosis ( 3 months and 4.5 months in Latin America) of AF and CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥1 were included. ERC was defined as treatment with an antiarrhythmic drug, catheter ablation, or cardioversion at the baseline. Multivariable logistic regression analysis determined the odds of receiving ERC and an oral anticoagulant OAC with results reported as adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR) and 95% Confidence Intervals (95%CI). Risk of major outcomes was determined using multiple Cox regression analyses. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause death and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Secondary outcomes included all-cause death, thromboembolism and major bleeding. Results were reported as adjusted Hazard Ratio (aHR) and 95%CI. Results 21,051 AF patients (age: 70.2±10.3, 45% female) were included. Of these, 6,932 (32.9%) received ERC, while 14,119 (67.1%) did not. Patients receiving ERC were younger with a higher prevalence of paroxysmal AF (62.8% vs. 53.2%) and heart failure (23.1% vs. 21.4%). They were less likely to have prior stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and they had a lower mean CHA2DS2-VASc score (3.0±1.5 vs. 3.3±1.5). Age ≥75 aOR: 0.53; 95%CI (0.0.49-0.57) and age 65-75 aOR: 0.76; 95%CI (0.70-0.82) were associated with lower odds of receiving ERC. Those with prior stroke/TIA aOR: 0.55; 95%CI (0.50-0.61) and COPD aOR: 0.82; 95%CI (0.71-0.94), as well as patients with more sustained form of AF and patients recruited in North America were less likely to receive ERC. Conversely, female sex, higher symptom burden, hypertension and coronary artery disease were associated with higher odds of receiving ERC (Figure 1). Patients who received ERC were more likely to receive OACs aOR: 1.36; 95%CI (1.25-1.48). Survival curve for the primary outcome according to ERC are shown in Figure 2. During a median follow-up of 3.0 IQR: 2.9-3.1 years, ERC was associated with lower risk of the primary composite outcome (aHR: 0.88, 95% CI:0.80-0.96, p=0.006); Similar results were observed for the secondary outcomes. Conclusions In a real-world population with recently diagnosed AF, clinical risk factors and characteristics were associated with ERC. Patients who received ERC had a reduced risk of major outcomes. These findings suggest that in real-world patients with AF, ERC may provide beneficial effects on long-term outcome.Odds Ratios to be treated with ERC.Survival curve.