Objective: The objective of this study was to examine the unique academic, behavior, and parent mental health challenges for children who qualify for a school individualized education program (IEP) during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: The authors recruited 302 parents of 5- to 10-year-old children in Michigan (February–March 2021), oversampling children with IEP supports through education-related organizations. Parents completed surveys about school format, child behavior, educational problems, IEP supports, parent stress, and depression symptoms. Results: Forty-seven children had an IEP, of whom 36% of parents stated their child was not receiving sufficient IEP services in 2020 to 2021. Reasons included unavailable services (41%), available services but parent unable to bring their child to school (12%), and only virtual services (47%). Compared with children without IEPs, children with IEPs had greater hyperactivity levels ( p < 0.0001), more peer problems ( p = 0.0003), and behavioral difficulties ( p = 0.0002) and their parents had higher depression symptoms (Centers for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale score >21, 42.6% vs 27.3%, p = 0.03). Parents of children with IEPs reported lower rates of meeting grade level reading (51.1% vs 77.5%, p = 0.0002), math (54.6% vs 78.9%, p = 0.0006), writing expectations (35.6% vs 67.9%, p < 0.0001), and higher prevalence of medication adjustment for behavior or attention (19.5% vs 4.1%, p = 0.0007) compared with children without an IEP. Conclusion: Over one-third of parents of children with IEPs reported their child's learning needs were not met during COVID-19. Lack of access to services may partially explain greater behavioral difficulties and parent depression symptoms in this group. When planning supports during an interruption of in-person instruction, social-emotional needs, behavioral intervention, family support, and academic goals should be addressed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Torres et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: