Preclinical study demonstrates that CFTR deficiency impairs endothelium-dependent vasorelaxation in animal models, highlighting CFTR as essential for vascular health in cystic fibrosis.
Genetic mutations in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene lead to cystic fibrosis (CF) which causes multiple health issues including lung disease and diabetes. Importantly, along with other health conditions, CF patients are long known to have impaired vascular function. Specifically, endothelium-dependent vasorelaxation is impaired in people with CF. However, the molecular mechanism(s) involved in the impairment of endothelial function in CF is not known. Since impaired endothelial function is an established risk factor for cardiovascular diseases, we investigated how CFTR regulates vascular endothelial function. We evaluated coronary arteries of CFTR -/- and littermate wild type piglets and noted profound endothelial dysfunction in coronary arteries of CFTR -/- piglets (n=10-12 rings/3 piglets). Next, we generated a mouse model with endothelium-specific deletion of CFTR (e-CFTR -/- ). Aortic rings of e-CFTR -/- mice showed a significant delay in endothelium-dependent vasorelaxation (P<0.001; n=20 rings /5 mice). To determine the molecular signaling mediating this effect, we used a pharmacological inhibitor of CFTR (CFTRinh-172) and examined changes in endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS). CFTRinh-172 treatment (10 μM, 5 days) led to a significant reduction in total and S1177 phosphorylated level of eNOS in human coronary artery endothelial cells (P<0.01 and P<0.05; n=3). In addition, CFTRinh-172 treated endothelial cells exhibited increased inflammation and altered endothelial cell metabolism (n=6; P<0.001). Together, these findings suggest that CFTR regulates eNOS and cellular metabolism in endothelial cells and therefore, functional CFTR is essential for vascular endothelial function. This fundamental role of CFTR in endothelial function will have future translational value in treating people with CF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Uppulapu et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: