Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the risk factors associated with residual stenosis in patients with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted at a single health-care center among coronary artery disease patients who have undergone PTCA. Primary information including demographics and clinical characteristics, groups of pre- and postdilation balloons, and characteristics of culprits’ vessel flow were retrieved from medical records of each patient. Data were analyzed using descriptive and appropriate comparative statistics. Results: A total of 1000 patients were included in this study. The majority of patients were men (67.0%). Hypertension (HTN) and diabetes were the most common comorbid condition. Yukon Choice phosphorylcholine (PC)-elite (86.2%) was the most common stent used in patients with PTCA followed by Endeavor Sprint (12.7%). All of the patients (100%) underwent PTCA for single culprit vessel disease (SVD) while 30.2% of the patients underwent PTCA for two-vessel disease (2VD). The incidence of residual stenosis was 0.5% for SVD PTCA and 0.3% for 2VD PTCA. The 2VD group achieved thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow Grade II postrevascularization in 98.6% of patients. Significant associations were observed between residual stenosis and various factors. HTN (odds ratio [OR]: 38.79, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.260-461.688; P = 0.004), diabetes mellitus (OR: 4.548, 95% CI: 0.036-63.948; P < 0.001), the use of a 0.014” × 190 cm guide (OR: 185.0, 95% CI: 25.922-1320.294; P < 0.001), and the presence of two-vessel disease (OR: 6.698, 95% CI: 1.221-36.749; P = 0.029) were found to be significantly associated with residual stenosis. Conclusion: Residual stenosis was observed in both SVD and 2VD PTCA however, presence of HTN and DM, and 2VD were identified as pronounced risk factors for residual stenosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bafna et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: