Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, necessitating effective risk stratification tools for improved management. ST-segment deviation in lead augmented vector right (aVR) has emerged as a potential prognostic marker in AMI, but its clinical relevance in the Indian context requires further investigation. Materials and Methods: We conducted a single-center prospective observational study among patients admitted with AMI to assess the prognostic value of ST-segment deviation in lead aVR. Patients were categorized based on the presence or absence of ST-segment deviation in lead aVR, and demographic, clinical, and angiographic characteristics were compared between groups. Follow-up evaluations were performed to assess left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and the incidence of ventricular tachycardia (VT). Results: The study enrolled 110 patients, categorizing them by ST-segment deviation in lead aVR. Patients with ST elevation in lead aVR showed higher moderate LVEF dysfunction (31%–40%) than those with isoelectric ST segments ( P = 0.0058). Conversely, patients with ST depression in lead aVR had increased preserved ejection fraction compared to those with an isoelectric ST segment ( P = 0.0414). <50% ST-segment resolution postpercutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was more common among non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) patients. The incidence of VT was higher in ST elevation in lead aVR ( P = 0.0045). Significant differences in ST-segment resolution after PCI ( P = 0.0117) between STEMI and NSTEMI patients were noted. Conclusion: ST-segment deviation in lead aVR serves as a valuable prognostic marker in AMI, correlating with adverse outcomes such as moderate LVEF dysfunction and increased risk of VT. Furthermore, its association with ST-segment resolution post-PCI highlights its role in assessing reperfusion success and guiding management strategies. These findings underscore the importance of ST-segment deviation in lead aVR for risk stratification and personalized management in AMI patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gandhi et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: