Metabarcoding is emerging as an alternative to morphological methods in noninvasive carnivore diet analysis based on scats. A number of metabarcoding markers have been developed but their comparative performance to recover DNA from scats remains mostly untested. We tested three markers covering a wide taxonomic range of prey items and compared them with the results of a morphological analysis. Morphological and genetic methods performed comparably regarding the identity of detected prey species, but the number of identified species varied strongly between markers. Only one, 12S-V5, amplified successfully in all samples and proved to be robust and reliable when working with the highly degraded DNA obtained from scats.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eusemann et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: