Crisis management is closely related to ethics. This study aims to reveal that crisis management and ethics to date remain limited to ethical crisis management, points out the need to deal with crisis management itself from the perspective of ethics, and raises the academic necessity of crisis management ethics. Based on the literature review of previous studies, we suggest meaningful implications as follows. First, the sustainable crisis management system consists of four phases based on previous studies. It is important to strengthen resilience through a more systematic and sustainable system. Second, based on the previous studies, we presented several critical factors for crisis management: risk management leadership, a training program and maneuvers through early risk anticipation through identifying, and evaluating key risks including latent risks. Third, there is the need for crisis management ethics for discussion related to ethics for crisis management and ethical crisis management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bang et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: