Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
This study aims to analyze the case of South Korea, where the government-led settlement support worker development system was operated as an active response to the diversification of migrants at the national level, and obtain implications for the training of settlement support experts. the composition of migrants varies.Discussions on the diversification of migrants have been focused on Western societies with a long history of migration, but the Korean government needs to also strengthened the system for fostering settlement support personnel, such as preparing guidelines for qualification management of settlement support personnel.To this end, this study conducted focus group discussion interviews with 15 experts and analyzed their narratives.The results are as follows.First, the government-led settlement support worker development system has limitations in responding flexibly to the labor market's manpower demand.Second, it is necessary to separate the education system for settlement support workers from the qualification system that recognizes the expertise of settlement support workers.From this case in South Korea, it is required to establish an education quality management system that embodies know-how that reflects the revision cycle of education programs and changes in the settlement support environment.Finally, a quality control system is needed to cultivate settlement support personnel.For this, active support and efforts from the government are required.
Roh et al. (Mon,) studied this question.