Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Abstract Background: Catheter-related bladder discomfort (CRBD) and pain commonly arises postoperatively among patients experiencing intra-operative urinary catheterization. The study aims to demonstrate the effectiveness of intravenous lidocaine to prevent CRBD and postoperative pain in complex lumbar spinal surgery. Methods: Sixty male patients, aged 20-79 years, scheduled for undergoing elective fusion spine surgery at least 2 levels were randomly assigned to obtain intravenous lidocaine (1.5 mg/kg then 2 mg/kg/h) (group L) or a parallel volume of normal saline (group C). The primary outcome was incidence of moderate to severe CRBD in a postanesthetic care unit (PACU) between group comparison. The secondary outcomes were postoperative pain and the postoperative 24-hour of opioid requirement, mild and moderate to severe CRBD at 1-, 2-, 6- and 24-hours postoperative periods, patient satisfaction the adverse effects of lidocaine and surgical complications. Results: Group L showed a significantly lower incidence of moderate-to-severe CRBD compared with that of group C at PACU (P = 0.002) and at 1 hour (P = 0.039). Moreover, group L experienced a significantly reduced average pain score compared with that of group C in all time periods (P<0.001, P<0.001, P=0.001, P<0.001 and P<0.001 at 0, 1, 2, 6 and 24 hours, respectively and significantly lower postoperative opioid requirement compared with that of group C at 2, 6 and 24 hours postoperatively (P=0.0022, P<0.001 and P<0.001, respectively). Group L experienced significant more satisfaction regarding GPES scores than group C (P< 0.001). No adverse outcome was found in both groups. Conclusion: Intravenous lidocaine administration exhibited significantly reduced moderate-to-severe CRBD at PACU and 1-hr post operative period. Moreover, the use of intravenous lidocaine during complex spine surgery resulted in reduction of postoperative pain, opioid requirement and improved patient satisfaction without side effects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chantrapannik et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: