Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
April 28, 2024Journal of Shoulder and Elbow SurgeryOpen Access

Comparable low revision rates of stemmed and stemless total anatomic shoulder arthroplasties after exclusion of metal-backed glenoid components: a collaboration between the Australian and Danish national shoulder arthroplasty registries

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

MNMarc Randall Kristensen NyringJRJeppe Vejlgaard RasmussenDGDavid R.J. Gill

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Nyring et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e6d2e5b6db643587650ae4https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2024.03.022
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1High revision rate of metal-backed glenoid component and impact on the overall revision rate of stemless total shoulder arthroplasty: a cohort study from the Danish Shoulder Arthroplasty Registry2024
  2. 2Stemless anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty in patients under 55 years of age with primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis: an analysis of the Australian Orthopedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry at 5 years2026
  3. 3Shoulder arthroplasty registry in the German-speaking D-A-CH region: analysis of 6339 primary and 760 revision procedures between 2021 and 20232026
  4. 4Glenoid morphology classification and computed tomography scanning prior to total shoulder arthroplasty: a population-level analysis from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry2025 · 1 citations
  5. 5Revision Shoulder Hemiarthroplasty and Total Shoulder Arthroplasty A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis2022 · 12 citations