Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article discusses whether it is rational and valuable to have hope in the face of the climate crisis. The aim is to explore a distinctive Kantian perspective characterized by three main elements. First, hope is not seen primarily as a means of sustaining action, but action is viewed as a condition for rational hope. Second, the value of certain 'fundamental' hopes is not merely instrumental but derives from their constitutive role in our practical identity. Here, I focus on Kantian hope in the compatibility of our fundamental ends, happiness and morality. Third, the rationality of such a hope presupposes trust – in particular, trust that our conceptions of morality and the good life are sufficiently flexible to adapt to drastically new circumstances.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Claudia Blöser (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: