Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The field of model-based testing has witnessed the development of several test strategies on finite state machines. Although these strategies are often related, little effort has been made to explicitly identify patterns shared between them, and their concrete implementations as well as completeness proofs regularly exhibit redundancy. In this paper, we propose an approach for the systematic verification and implementation of strategies for the language-equivalence conformance relation. We present frameworks in the form of higher order functions that implement shared behaviour once and encapsulate diverging behaviour in procedural parameters, thus reducing duplication and improving maintainability and extensibility. We show that this simplifies completeness proofs by proving complete all considered strategies using the same argument. All presented frameworks, proofs, and concrete strategy implementations have been mechanised using the proof assistant Isabelle.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Robert Sachtleben (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: