Prospective study shows reductions in immune biomarkers sICAM-1 and sβ2M in HIV/HCV-coinfected individuals, suggesting DAA therapy's immunomodulatory effect.
Limited evidence is available on the impact of direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy on immune activation biomarkers in individuals coinfected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV). This study aimed to characterize longitudinal changes in soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (sICAM-1), soluble β2-microglobulin (sβ2M), and soluble CD14 (sCD14), following DAA treatment in an HIV/HCV-coinfected cohort in Indonesia. A prospective study was conducted involving 132 HIV/HCV-coinfected individuals treated with sofosbuvir/daclatasvir for 12 or 24 weeks. Plasma samples were collected at baseline and 12 weeks post-DAA therapy. Levels of sICAM-1, sβ2M, and sCD14 were quantified using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Linear regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of biomarker changes. A sustained virological response was achieved in 96.2% of coinfected participants. At baseline, the HIV/HCV-coinfected group exhibited significantly higher levels of sICAM-1 and sCD14 compared to levels found in HIV monoinfection. At 12 weeks post-treatment, significant reductions in sICAM-1 (p < 0.0002) and sβ2M levels (p < 0.0002) were observed, irrespective of the baseline liver fibrosis stage. No significant change was noted in sCD14 levels. Notably, sICAM-1 levels post-treatment remained elevated compared to those in HIV monoinfection. Lower baseline serum albumin was an independent predictor of sβ2M reduction. DAA therapy was associated with significant reductions in sICAM-1 and sβ2M levels among HIV/HCV-coinfected individuals, irrespective of liver fibrosis stage. These findings highlight the immunomodulatory benefits of DAA therapy across different stages of liver disease in the Indonesian population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yunihastuti et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: