Descriptive study reveals dressmaking program improves skills and income for graduates, indicating broader economic challenges.
This study assessed the perceptions of TESDA Dressmaking NC II graduates regarding changes in their employment and income status after completing the program and passing the National Competency (NC II) assessment, and examined how they view the importance of Competency-Based Training (CBT) in their personal and professional development. Within the Philippine TVET framework, CBT is recognized as a key strategy for enhancing workforce readiness and promoting inclusive growth, making its evaluation both theoretically and policy relevant. A descriptive quantitative design was employed and the study was conducted in Ilocos Norte and Ilocos Sur, Philippines, with 100 graduates selected through purposive and snowball sampling. Data were gathered using a structured online checklist and analyzed through descriptive statistics. Findings showed that graduates agreed the program enhanced their employability (overall mean = 2.65) and improved their financial situation (overall mean = 2.77). The highest-rated indicators were increased confidence in applying for jobs or starting a business (M = 2.75) and the acquisition of dressmaking skills as a source of income (M = 2.79). However, challenges emerged in securing employment directly related to dressmaking (M = 2.56) and attaining substantial financial stability (M = 2.74), highlighting a persistent job-skills mismatch and modest economic returns. These results suggest that while the program provides technical competencies and fosters entrepreneurial confidence, its broader economic impact is constrained by external labor market conditions. Addressing these gaps requires stronger industry linkages, targeted entrepreneurial support, and closer alignment between training content and market needs. Such measures would maximize the benefits of TESDA’s Dressmaking NC II program and strengthen TVET’s contribution to sustainable livelihoods.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mylene Calaranan (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: